“百家争鸣”与建国初期的历史学  

"Letting a Hundred Schools of Thought Contend"and the Historical Studies in the Early Days of New China

作　　者：贾艳敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学历史系

出　　处：《当代中国史研究》2008年第2期22-27,共6页Contemporary China History Studies

摘　　要："百家争鸣"是20世纪50年代中期"双百"方针的一个方面,最初是针对历史学问题的争论提出的,"百家争鸣"方针的贯彻推动了历史学研究的进一步发展。建国初期,历史学领域里的争鸣较之其他学科领域的争鸣更为活跃,取得了丰硕的成果。1959年1月郭沫若发表《谈蔡文姬的〈胡笳十八拍〉》再次引发了史学争鸣的热潮,通过讨论,有关问题的研究越来越深入,涉及面越来越广,相关资料的发掘和整理工作也取得了很大进展。'Letting a hundred schools of thought contend'was a part and parcel of the'policy of letting a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend'set forth in the mid 1950s,initially for dealing with the contentions over historical problems.The implementation of the principle of'letting a hundred schools of thought contend'promoted further development of histori- cal studies.There was a more lively academic atmosphere in the historical field than in other disci- plines in the early days of New China,with abundant results.With the publication of Guo Moruo's article'On Reed-Pipe Song in Eighteen Stanzas by Cai Wenji'in January 1959,a new upsurge of historical contentions followed.Through heated discussions the studies on relevant issues became more profound and covered more extensive areas and the excavation and sorting out of relevant mate- rials also made great progress.

关 键 词：“百家争鸣” 历史学 建国初期 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学] K27