关于违约金数额调整的裁量权问题研究  

Research on Arbitral Power of Adjustment to the Amount of Liquidated Damages for Breach of Contract

作　　者：辛香玲[1] 王素侠 

机构地区：[1]重庆城市管理职业学院民政学院,重庆400055 [2]中共河北唐海县委党校,河北唐海063200

出　　处：《河北青年管理干部学院学报》2008年第3期78-80,共3页Journal of Hebei Youth Administrative Cadres College

基　　金：河北省哲学社会科学规划课题(编号:200602019)

摘　　要：当事人自由约定违约金是合同自由的具体体现,但违约金数额过高或过低,会造成对当事人一方的不公平待遇。大陆法系、英美法系和我国合同法都对违约金条款采取了予以干预的原则,但法律的过度干预又将违背合同自由原则。我国合同法实有必要借鉴外国法的经验,适当限制法院和仲裁机构的裁量权。Liquidated damages for breach of contract of the parties reflect the contract freedom,However, if the amount of liquidated damages is too high or too low, the side of the parties will receive unfair treatment. The two big different law systems and PRC contract law all adopt intervention principle towards Liquidated damages items. But too much law intervention is against the contract freedom principles. It is necessary for our contract law to draw experience from foreign countries in adjustment of the amount of liquidated damages to properly restrict the power of the court or arbitral organizations.

关 键 词：违约金 调整 裁量权 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]