检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜小卫[1]
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学经济法学院,陕西西安710063
出 处:《河北法学》2008年第6期30-34,共5页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:随着互联网络和电子商务的迅猛发展,域名抢注问题也愈演愈烈。如何从法律上认定域名抢注这一新生事物,依法协调与保护域名抢注纠纷中当事人的利益,就具有非常重要的意义。对我国关于域名抢注法律规制的现状进行分析的基础之上,指出解决我国当前域名抢注法律规制中存在问题的途径是统一域名抢注立法,确立域名抢注法律规制的基本规则;同时修改《商标法》、《反不正当竞争法》等相关法律法规,为我国规范域名抢注提供多种法律手段。Along with the swift and overwhelming development of internet and electronic commerce, what is called domain name hijacking is increasingly fierce. Defining the nature of the domain name hijacking as a newly emerging phenomenon from legal perspective plays a significantly important role in coordinating and safeguard the interests of the parties involved in the dispute concerning domain name hijacking. Based on analysis of the present eonditions with respect to the legal regulation over domain name hijacking in China, this article presents the idea that the effective solution for resolving problems of regulation over domain name hijacking is to standardize the corresponding legislation, thus establishing the foundemental governing rules,and simultaneously revise laws including Trademark Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law to provide muhi-solutions for regulating domain name hijacking in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112