检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙占利[1]
机构地区:[1]广东商学院,广东广州510320
出 处:《现代法学》2008年第3期114-122,共9页Modern Law Science
基 金:广东省哲学社会科学规划项目"和谐网络社会之法治构建研究"(07G02)
摘 要:电子商务法的国际协调性和趋同性并未完全统一当前关于电子商务法基本原则的不同立法主张或理论观点。目前主张的原则大多属于与电子商务法的基本原则有关的立法指导思想、立法技术、具体原则及传统商法的基本原则的范畴,其中技术中立原则和媒介中立原则才属于电子商务法的基本原则。融合了公平原则、过错责任原则和技术局限免责理念的技术风险合理分配原则作为电子商务法的基本原则在立法中已有反映但未能在理论上得到重视。International coordination and similarity ot E-commerce law has not led to unilication of legislative intents or theoretical views concerning the basic principles of E-commerce law. Most of the principles formulated now are either of legislative guidelines and technique, or of practice and traditional law commercial, which, strictly speaking, do not qualify as fundamental principles with the exception of technology neutrality principle and media neutrality principle. The contribution of technical risk principle, having incorporated the justice principle, the faulty liability principle and the notion of immunity from liability due to technical limitation, has already been held as a basic principle in some legislation but not ever gained its recognition in logic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.107.122