检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马洪荣[1]
机构地区:[1]枣庄市立医院,山东枣庄277101
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志(下半月刊)(外科护理)》2008年第4期5-7,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
基 金:枣庄市卫生局立项课题(2007065)
摘 要:目的:探讨聊天护理对提高肺癌患者生存质量的主要影响因素。方法:将120例肺癌患者随机分为观察组和对照组各60例,对照组给予常规护理,观察组在此基础上实施聊天护理。采用肺癌患者生存质量测定量表FACT-L分别对两组进行生存质量测定。结果:两组生存质量总体评价:观察组最高128分,最低60分,平均83.71±16.16分;对照组最高90分,最低46分,平均63.21±13.01分,两组比较有极显著性差异(P<0.01),其中生理状况、心理状况、社会/家庭状况、功能状况、与医护的关系和附加的关注情况6个领域评分观察组均高于对照组,两组比较均有极显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:实施聊天护理较好地提高了肺癌患者的生存质量,取得满意的护理效果。Objective : To study the influence factors to be able to improve the quality of life of patients with lung cancer by chatting with patients in the nursing care. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into observation group ( n = 60 ) and control group ( n = 60 ). Routine nursing care was given in control group and chatting was additionally adopted on the basis of routine nursing care in observation group. FACT - L scale was used to make an evaluation on the quality of life of patients in both groups. Results: In observation group, the highest score was 128 and the lowest score was 60, the average scores were 83.71 ± 16.16 ; in control group, the highest score was 90 and the lowest score was 46, the average scores were 63.21 ± 13.01. There was significant difference in the comparison of the scores between the two groups ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The scores of grading in physiological and psychological status and in social/family status, function status and relationship between medical personnel and patients were higher in observation group than that in control group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion: Chatting in the nursing care of patients with lung cancer can evidently improve their quality of life and satisfactory effect can be obtained.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.32