检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘春[1] 王倩[1] 周泽梅[1] 彭献代[1] 颜俊锋[1]
出 处:《重庆医学》2008年第10期1080-1081,共2页Chongqing medicine
摘 要:目的探讨不同内瘘制作方法对糖尿病肾病患者行动静脉内瘘的优势。方法总结本院2000-2006年对糖尿病肾病患者施行的内瘘手术64例,分别采用直接缝合法行端侧吻合制作内瘘和钛轮钉端吻合建立动静脉内瘘。比较两种类型内瘘的成功率和并发症发生率。结果直接缝合法行内瘘成功率高,并发症少,2年内瘘通畅率达93.8%;钛轮钉端吻合建立的动静脉内瘘为71,9%。结论在糖尿病肾病患者中用直接缝合法行内瘘效果好,可以作为糖尿病肾病患者建立血管通路的首选方式。Objective To explore the advantage between End-slde anastomosis and titanium nail therapy for diabetic nephropathy patients in establishing arterio-venous fistula. Methods Retrospective summation of the successful rate and complications in 64 arterio-venous fistula with diabetic nephropathy from 2000 to 2006 was made,there were 32 fistula of End-side anastomosis,and 32 fistula of titanium nail therapy. Results In End-slde anastomosis group,93, 8% arterio-venous fistula utility time was over 2 years; titanium nail therapy 71.9% , which was significantly longer than in titanium nail group. In End-side anastomosis group, the incidences of complications were lower than in titanium nail group. Conclusion End-side anastomosis is the first choice for arterio-venous fistula on diabetic nephropathy patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.239.69