检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘辉[1] 潘家华[1] 何金根[1] 计明红[1] 陶松雪[1] 吕勇[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属省立医院儿科,安徽合肥230001
出 处:《临床儿科杂志》2008年第5期427-429,441,共4页Journal of Clinical Pediatrics
摘 要:目的利用潮气呼吸法对小年龄哮喘患儿进行支气管舒张试验,探讨支气管舒张试验在5岁以下患儿哮喘诊断中的价值。方法将2006年1月-2007年5月就诊的哮喘患儿246例,根据不同年龄段分为4组,Ⅰ组0~1岁,Ⅱ组~3岁,Ⅲ组~5岁,Ⅳ组~6岁。以0.5%沙丁胺醇作为支气管舒张药物,用潮气呼吸肺功能分析各组吸药前后肺功能指标变化。结果Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组吸药前后达峰时间比(tPTEF/tE)、达峰容积比(VPEF/VE)差异均无统计学意义(t=0.065~0.179,P>0.05);Ⅳ组吸药前后tPTEF/tE和VPEF/VE差异均有统计学意义(t=-4.295、5.029,P<0.05)。tPTEF/tE和VPEF/VE吸药前后差值与年龄呈正相关(P<0.05)。随年龄增大,差值逐渐增高。tPTEF/tE改善率和VPEF/VE改善率组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论潮气呼吸法支气管舒张试验在5岁以下哮喘患儿诊断中无明确临床价值,对于>5岁哮喘患儿诊断与成人哮喘相同具有诊断意义。Objectives To evaluate the bronchodilation test by tidal breathing in diagnosing asthma in children. Methods A total of 246 children who came to the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University, presented with wheeze, aged 3 - 72 months were recruited. They were divided into four groups according to their ages: group 1 (0- 1 year old, n=57), group2 ( -3yearsold, n=59), group3 ( - 5 years old, n=70), group 4( - 6years old, n = 60). All received salbutamol. Tidal breathing flow-volume loop and parameters obtained before and after aerosol inhalation were evaluated. Results ( 1 ) There were no significant recovery in tPTEF/tE and VPEF/VE in groups 1, 2 and 3 after inhaling the drug (P 〉 0.05), while significant recovery was observed in group 4 (P 〈 0.05). (2) The improvement of tPTEF/tE and VPEF/VE after inhalation was positively correlated with age. (3) There were significant differences in the change of tPTEF/tE and VPEF/VE among the four groups. Conclusions Bronchodilation test by tidal breathing had less value in diagnosing asthma for children under five years old.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68