检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:栾积毅[1] 孙锐[1] 路军锋[1] 姚娜[1] 吴少华[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学燃烧工程研究所,黑龙江省哈尔滨市150001
出 处:《中国电机工程学报》2008年第14期73-79,共7页Proceedings of the CSEE
基 金:国家重点基础研究专项经费项目(2006CB200303);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-05-0336)~~
摘 要:采用恒温沉降炉研究了秸秆、稻壳2种生物质及一种煤粉作为再燃燃料的NO还原特性,针对燃料种类、过量空气系数、停留时间及再燃比例4个因素的改变对脱硝率的影响进行了实验研究,同时对3种燃料的再燃燃尽特性进行了分析。研究表明:生物质脱硝能力明显高于煤粉,提高再然比例及减小过量空气系数,3种燃料的脱硝率有不同程度的提高,其中秸秆脱硝率最高,稻壳中等,煤粉最低;在一定的再燃停留时间内(650 ms),延长停留时间,脱硝率增加,超过这一停留时间,脱硝率增加缓慢。生物质与煤粉相比,在相同反应条件下能获得更高的脱硝效果,同时其不完全燃烧损失保持在合理的范围内。Nitric oxide (NO) reduction process by reburning with two kinds of biomasses corn straw, rice husk and one pulverized bituminous coal were studied in an isothermal high temperature drop tube furnace (DTF). Experimental studies were performed on influences of NO removal efficiency by fuel type, excess air ratio (SR), resident time, and reburning fuel fraction. Meanwhile, burnout of three reburning fuels was analyzed. The results show that biomass owns higher NO removal efficiency than pulverized coal. NO removal efficiency of three kinds of fuels increases by different extent through the increase of reburn fuel fraction and the decrease of the excess air ratio. NO removal efficiency of corn straw is the most efficient; rice husk is medium, pulverized bituminous coal is the lowest. Within the certain reburn resident time (650 ms), NO removal efficiency increases quickly with the resident time. Beyond this resident time limit, NO removal efficiency increase slowly. In the tested conditions, biomass was more efficient than pulverized bituminous coal for NO removal efficiency and unburnt carbon in fly ash was within reasonable limits.
分 类 号:TM224[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.46.129