SPECIAL ISSUE： IMPORTANT ISSUES IN MARXIST PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA：The essential tension： on the distinction of ideality and actuality in Marxist philosophy  

作　　者：Wang Nanshi 

机构地区：[1]Department of Philosophy, Nankai University

出　　处：《Social Sciences in China》2008年第2期162-171,共10页中国社会科学（英文版）

摘　　要：There are two opposing tendencies in the history of Westem philosophy： one is the Platonic- Hegelian tradition that mixes actuality and ideality, the other is the Aristotelian-Kantian tradition that differentiates the two. Marx distanced himself from the former by his critiques of Hegelism, but the later generations have in a sense turned back to it in their interpretation of Marxist theory. Despite its significance, this reversal is fundamentally inconsistent with Marxist philosophy, and will frequently have unfortunate results in practice. Therefore it is of great necessity to clarify the theoretical distinction between Marxism and Hegelism on this issue.在西方哲学史上存在着两种对立的哲学倾向，一种是将现实性与理想性加以混同的柏拉图一黑格尔哲学传统，另一种是将二者加以界分的亚里士多德-康德哲学传统。马克思通过对黑格尔哲学的批判背离了将二者加以混同的前一传统，但后人在对马克思哲学的阐释中却又在某种意义上回归到了黑格尔主义传统。这种回归虽有其积极意义，但在根本上并不符合马克思哲学的倾向，且在现实生活中还往往会导致不良的后果，因而在理论上就十分必要划清马克思主义与黑格尔主义在此问题上的界限。

关 键 词：Marxist philosophy IDEALITY ACTUALITY Hegelism 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]