检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方元[1]
出 处:《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》2008年第2期38-41,共4页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition
基 金:湖南省教育科学规划课题阶段性成果(编号为:xjk07djc005)
摘 要:在当前以及今后相当长的一段时期,我国对于死刑的态度将是保留并尽量予以限制,这已成为学界的共识。目前,我国学界大都是从"罪名限制论"以及"司法限制论"等角度展开探讨,而忽视了限制死刑的第三条道路——"死刑赦免限制论"。本文将首先对学界所主张的两种主要死刑限制论作一简要评价,进而论述在我国设立死刑赦免制度的必要性以及可行性,在此基础上对于建立有中国特色的死刑赦免制度提出完整的设想。It is a consensus that the attitude towards death sentence in China has been reserved and even confined at present and it will last for a long time. So far, the academiac has expanded the explortion on it from the two apects of "Allegation of Charge Restriction" and "Allegation of Judicature Restriction", but has ignored the other way of restricting death sentence-Allegation of Restriction of Death Penalty Absolution. This paper makes a brief comment on the two main claims of death penalty restriction at the beginnig, and then elaborates on the necessity of setting death penalty absolution system in China, and finally propounds the presumption of setting a death penalty absolution system with Chinese characteristics based on what is mentioned above.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.22.238