检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南警官学院,云南昆明650223
出 处:《云南警官学院学报》2008年第3期34-37,共4页The Journal of Yunnan Police College
摘 要:确认走私、贩卖、运输、非法持有毒品的行为是否构成犯罪,主观上要求犯罪嫌疑人、被告人"明知"。而"主观明知"的认定在司法实践中是一个困难而复杂的问题,给司法部门打击毒品犯罪带来了极大的困扰。因此,如何恰当地运用"推定",在一定条件下推定犯罪嫌疑人、被告人"主观明知"成为刑事立法发展完善和司法实践的必然选择。"推定"的依法合理运用,为司法机关有效打击毒品犯罪提供了新的思路和途径。To confirm whether the crimes on smuggling, trafficking, transporting and possessing drugs illegally are criminal offences, subjectively, it requires the suspects or the defendants should "Know" what they did. However, the cognizance of "Subjective Knowing" is a very difficult and complicated problem in judicial practice, which causes big problems for judicial departments for com- bating drug crimes. Therefore, it becomes an inevitable choice for criminal lawmaking development consummation and judicial practice to know how to apply "Judgment" correctly, to judge the suspects and defendants under some certain conditions. To apply "Judgment" rationally will lead a new way and bring the new ideas to judicial organs on cracking down on drug crimes effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145