检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学食品工程与营养科学学院,西安710062 [2]河南农业大学农学院,郑州450002
出 处:《生物加工过程》2008年第3期34-38,共5页Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(20272035);教育部科学技术研究重点资助项目(104167)
摘 要:采用超声波强化和微波辅助提取2种方法提取防风多糖,并与传统热水浸提法在多糖的提取率上进行比较。防风多糖超声提取的最佳工艺条件为超声功率1 000 W、提取时间25 min、液固体积质量比为25,防风多糖微波提取的最佳工艺条件为微波功率560 W、液固体积质量比为30、提取时间10 min,在最佳提取工艺下,2种方法的提取率分别为6.103%和7.639%。与传统热水浸提法相比,超声法和微波法提取防风多糖具有迅速、节能、高效、提取率高等诸多优点。To optimize the best extraction process of polysaccharides from Radix Saposhnikovia. Polysaccharides from Saposhnikovia divaricata ( Turez. ) Schischk were obtained through ultrasonic-intensified extraction and microwave-assisted extraction, the two methods and the traditional hot water extraction method were compared on the yield of polysaccharides. The optimal conditions of ultrasonic-intensified extraction were ultrasonic power of 1 000 W, extraction time of 25 min and liquid-solid ratio of 25. The optimal conditions of microwave-assisted extraction were microwave power of 560 W, extraction time of 10 min and liquid-solid ratio of 30. Under these conditions, the yield of the two methods were 6. 103% and 7. 639% respectively. The results show that the two extraction methods are simpler, more convenient and efficient than the tradtional hot water extraction method.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.200.145