检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国心血管病研究》2008年第6期434-435,共2页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research
摘 要:目的探索主动固定电极在右室间隔部起搏的可行性和安全性。方法需要置入心脏起搏器的患者40例,男性26例,女性14例,年龄58~81岁。21例采用主动固定电极右室间隔部固定,19例采用被动固定电极心尖部固定。结果主动电极与被动电极置入时起搏参数差异无统计学意义,术后随访起搏参数差异无统计学意义[(0.71±0.20)V和(0.66±0.18)V,(804±115)Ω和(853±188)Ω,P均>0.05)。结论使用主动电极右室间隔部起搏与被动电极一样是安全可行的。Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) ventricular septum pacing. Methods Fourty patients were dividied into two groups randomly. One group underwent the right ventricular outflow septum with the active fixation lead. The other underwent the right ventricular apex pacing with the passive fixation lead. The patients were fllow-up at 1,3,6 months after being discharge. Results There were no significance diffience in threshold and impedance between two groups at 15 minutes after the active fixation lead was planted[ (0.71±0.20)V vs(0.66±0.18 )V, (804±115 )Ω vs(853±188 )Ω, all P〉0.05 ), and no significent difference in follow-up period. Conclusion It is safety and feasible to pace from RVOT septum with active electrode.
关 键 词:心脏病学 主动固定电极 被动固定电极 右室间隔部 心脏起搏 人工
分 类 号:R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28