动结式“V累”的句法语义分析及其理论蕴涵  

The Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of the VRC V-lei (累) and its Theoretic Implication

作　　者：施春宏[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京语言大学对外汉语研究中心,北京100083

出　　处：《语言科学》2008年第3期242-258,共17页Linguistic Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(项目批准号:05BYY044);北京语言大学科研项目(项目批准号:07YB03)的资助

摘　　要：文章通过特定个案的分析来探讨句法构造过程中原则和规则、规则和例外、理论和事实之间的关系等相关理论问题。文章首先分析了学界对动结式"追累"的语义理解所存在的问题,进而指出"追累"如果出现"张三追李四,张三累了"这种释义则是动结式论元结构的整合原则及其规则所不允许的,并从不同的角度来论证:如果认同这种释义的存在,则至多只能将它看作句法规则的特例而不能视为通例,因而对它所提出的各种句法规则都是特设的,而特设性规则是不能经受数据完备性和可靠性检验的。句法构造是在原则支配下的系统而精细的规则化过程,规则系统中的例外应该是极为有限而又可以通过附加某个条件得到解释的。文章还借此探讨对句子理解的语感差异问题,认为输出型语感比输入型语感在建立规则时有更高的参考价值。The article explores the relationship between principles and rules, rules and their exceptions, as well as the relationship between theories and facts in the process of syntactic construction. Firstly it analyzes the existing problems concerning semantic interpretation of verb-resultative construction （VRC） V-lei（累）. Secondly, it points out that it would be a misinterpretation of V-lei （累） according to the principles of integration and rules of VRC’s argument structure, if V-lei（ 累 ） has appeared in the cases like ＂Zhang San（张三） chased Li Si（李四）, Zhang San（张三） got tired＂. It is an exception at the most , rather a general rule. Rules proposed for such exception is ad hoc in nature and cannot satisfy the requirements of complicity and reliabity of data. It further states that syntactic construction is the systematic and specific process of regularization dominated by certain princip the exceptions should be limited which it could nevertheless be interpreted under certain cond es, so tions. Finally, the article tackles the problem of individual＇s diversified comprehension and interpretation of sentences by concluding that the output sense of language would have a higher referential value comparing with the input sense of language in process of constructing rules.

关 键 词：动结式 论元结构 概念结构 例外 通例 输出型语感 

分 类 号：H146[语言文字—汉语]