尾套法与颈动脉法测量大鼠血压的相关性研究  

Study on the Relativity of Measurements of Blood Pressure by Tail-Cuff and Carotid Arterial Methods in Rats

作　　者：董幸[1] 潘燕[1] 孟延[1] 李新[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学医学院生物医学工程研究所,山东济南250012

出　　处：《实验室研究与探索》2008年第5期53-55,共3页Research and Exploration In Laboratory

摘　　要：对比研究无创尾套法与有创颈总动脉法测量健康大鼠血压的相关性。依次使用尾套法和颈总动脉法测量不同性别和年龄组的健康大鼠收缩压。各组无创血压值均高于有创血压值(P<0.001),两者呈显著直线相关(P<0.01)。清醒动物实验中使用无创血压可以有效,便捷地获取血压参数,减少动物创伤应激。To comparatively stduy the relativity of measurements of blood pressure by non-invasive（NIBP） and invasive carotid arterial methods in healthy rats. Systolic blood pressure was measured using tail-cuff and carotid arterial methods orderly in every rat grouped according to sex and age. The non-invasive tail-cuff provides higher SBP compared with invasive carotid arterial method in every group（ P 〈 0. 001 ）. There are remarkable linear correlation and statistical signi- fication（P 〈 0.01 ）. During the experiments of conscious animals, the SBP parameter can be obtained availably and conveniently, and wound stress can be reduced with non-invasive blood pressure.

关 键 词：无创血压 尾套法 有创血压 相关性 

分 类 号：R33-33[医药卫生—人体生理学]