检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学法学院,长沙410083
出 处:《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2008年第3期4-7,共4页Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:我们仅在刑事公诉权的范围内讨论检察官自由裁量权是不全面的,在立案侦查权、刑事诉讼法律监督权以及民事、行政案件抗诉权之中,我国检察官也拥有自由裁量权。检察官自由裁量权有行政与司法的双重属性,行政权的扩张性要求严格控制行政性裁量权,司法权的中立性使得司法性裁量权应适当扩大。法律还须加大对检察官自由裁量权范围的程序性控制。It's unilateral to discuss the prosecutorial discretion only in the range of criminal public prosecution power.Prosecutors of China also have discretion in case-filing and investigative power,legal superintendence power of criminal litigation and anti-prosecution power of civil and administrative cases.Prosecutorial discretion has both the nature of executive power and that of judicial power.The executive discretion should be strictly controlled because executive power is easy to be extended and the judicial discretion should be extended because judicial power is comparatively neutual.At the same time,procedural control on the range of prosecutorial discretion should be strengthened.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D926.3[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117