检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李怀东[1] 曾惠[1] 高国旺[1] 张海滨[1]
出 处:《中国药物应用与监测》2008年第3期28-29,63,共3页Chinese Journal of Drug Application and Monitoring
摘 要:目的:探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)静脉溶栓治疗后ST段再抬高对患者近期预后的影响。方法:将首发98例患者按静脉溶栓治疗后心电图有无ST段再抬高分为ST段再抬高组(A组)和ST段无再抬高组(B组),比较两组危险因素、再灌注心律失常、心功能、梗死后心绞痛及并存疾病等。结果:两组伴发糖尿病、原发性高血压及吸烟比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组梗死部位、再灌注心律失常、心功能分级、梗死后心绞痛比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:AMI静脉溶栓治疗后短暂的ST段再抬高可作为心肌再灌注成功的一种临床表现,对患者近期预后无不良影响。Objective: To explore the influence of ST segment re-elevation on the recent prognosis posterior to AMI. Methods: 98 patients were divided into two groups: ST segment re-elevation group (A group) and none-ST segment re-elevation group (B group). Cardiac arrhythmia after reperfusion, heart function, postinfarction angina pectoris and complications were analyzed in two groups. Results: There were no difference of concomitant diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, smoking rate between two groups (P 〉 0.05). Cardiac arrhythmia after reperfusion, cardiac function grade, postinfarction angina pectoris were compared in two groups, but there were no difference between two groups (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion: Transient ST segment re-elevation after intravenous throm-belytic therapy in patients with AMI could be considered as one clinical performance of successful reperfusion of myocardium, which has no negtive influence on the recent prognosis posterior to AMI.
分 类 号:R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127