检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗海盛[1]
出 处:《青海师专学报》2008年第3期56-59,共4页Journal of Qinghai Junior Teachers' College
摘 要:2005年新修订的公司法第183条规定了股东可以提起解散公司之诉的司法解散,为股东提供了一种新的救济途径,也为法官审判提供了法律依据。在尊重公司自治、防止股东机会主义以及司法适当干预方面,立法做了许多努力。但与发达国家公司法相比,仍存在需要考究的部分,如法院解散裁判问题、恶意诉讼问题以及诉讼担保和公司维持经营问题。Judicial dissolution of company is at once a new relief for the shareholders and a legal excuse for courts to make decisions. Many efforts have been made on respecting corporate autonomy, preventing evil litigations and involving the cases properly. However, comparing with that of developed countries, we still have much to do, such as the verdicts of dissolution of company, evil litigations and the preserving of company. Therefore, we must try to find any substitute recovery means to save the company, do our best to prevent the evil litigations and give any ways to protect the interests of any walks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.82