检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海大学文学院,上海200444
出 处:《中州大学学报》2008年第2期27-30,共4页Journal of Zhongzhou University
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划青年课题阶段性成果"城市社区管理体制创新"(2007ESH002)
摘 要:公共经济学与社会学组织分析学派对边界问题的讨论分别代表了社区自治边界划分的两类观点,一类观点有明确的界限以及划分依据,一类观点没有明确的界限,但是这两类观点表述的状况在我国社区建设中却同时存在,我们分别称之为社区自治边界的分异与融合现象。这两种现象从表面上看差异较大,但实际上都在反映交换行为中等价交换物的购买力状况,社区自治边界的厘定直接与社区各类主体之间所拥有资源的购买力相关。The boundary of community autonomous has been talked about by two school of thoughts, one is the public economics and the other is organization analysis school of sociology. Public economics give the explicit boundary as well as divides the basis, the other not. In the course of community autonomous, the city sees the two pictures of the two schools have talked about. We give two names to these pictures: community autonomous boundary differentiation and the fusion phenomenon separately. The Phenomenon is so different, in fact they reflecting the exchange behavior under the two type of recourse. The purchasing power of resource defines the the boundary of community autonomous.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.0