欧共体竞争法罚款制度的特点及对中国的启示  

The Features of EC Competition Law's Fine System and Its Lessons to China

作　　者：郑鹏程[1] 敖璐[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南大学法学院,长沙410082

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第3期88-91,共4页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"反垄断立法疑难问题研究"(07BFX042)

摘　　要：世界各国的反垄断法实施机制有两种模式:司法模式和行政模式。欧共体竞争法主要通过欧共体委员会征收罚款的方式保障竞争法的实施,是行政模式的典型代表。中国《反垄断法》以欧共体竞争法为蓝本,反垄断执法机构集调查权、决定权与处罚权于一身,属于典型的行政执法模式。鉴于欧共体竞争法的实施具有较长的历史并已积累了丰富的经验,要使中国反垄断法的实施达到与欧共体竞争法同样的效果,应当借鉴欧共体竞争法的实施经验,制定统一、具体的罚款指南,使减免政策明确并具有可预测性。The anti-monopoly law＇ s enforcement institution of most countries in the world can be divided into judicial and administrative model. The EC which enforces its competition law mainly by EU Commission belongs to the latter. Just as EU Commission, China＇ s antimonopoly authority is also an administrative body which has broad discretion. In view of long history and good experience of EC competition law, and absence of the experience of anti - monopoly law, China could get something from the enforcement of EC Competition law, such as enacting uniform and specific fine guidance and making amnesty policies predictable and clearer.

关 键 词：欧共体竞争法 罚款 反垄断执法 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学] D631.5[政治法律—国际法学]