检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩冰[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学人权与人道主义法研究所,北京100088
出 处:《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》2008年第4期62-65,共4页Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
摘 要:从西周至清末,中国传统契约制度形成了独具特色并高度发达的制度体系,但中国传统契约在缔约形式方面、缔约主体方面和契约内容等方面受到重重羁绊与束缚,从而无以养成负载现代契约精神的契约自由原则。但中国传统契约注重缔结契约双方的"和同"原则,蕴含了契约自由思想的质素,与近代西方民法中的"契约自由原则"潜在契合,为近代中国民法继受契约自由原则提供了本土资源支持。From Xizhou dynasty to late Qing dynasty, China' s traditional contract system went through 2000 years of evolution and accordingly developed a unique and highly developed contract system. However, China' s traditional contract system has not breed out the principle of freedom of contract as it has been fettered by many traditional factors. At the same time, China' s traditional contract system attachs importance to the agreements of the two sides of the contract which provide the resources to support the civil law of late China transplant the principle of freedom of contract.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173