检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于桂凤[1]
出 处:《十堰职业技术学院学报》2008年第3期25-27,共3页Journal of Shiyan Technical Institute
摘 要:目前众多国内外的学者纷纷进行对相对人的抵抗权的研究,我们国家相关法律也对此做了一些类似规定。但是,我国行政法对于相对方的抵抗权的规定一直处于"犹抱琵琶半遮面"的状况,只在为数不多的法律文件中做了规定,因此作者认为行政相对方抵抗权已经能够在我国法律体制中发现,但是需要对其进行系统分析研究。At present, many scholars both at home and abroad are doing the research on the right of resistance related to man, about which Chinese government has made some relevant laws. However, the Administrative Law of China for the right of the resistance has been in an unclear situation except few legal documents provided. The author thinks that the administrative relevant right of resistance has been embodied in China's legal system , but it needs to be a systematic analysis study.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7