关于德日犯罪论体系的若干辩驳  

The rebutment on crime system in Germany and Japan

作　　者：付立庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872

出　　处：《云南大学学报（法学版）》2008年第3期29-34,共6页Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition

基　　金：司法部2006年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目立项课题之"重构我国的犯罪构成理论--比较研究与路径选择"(项目编号06SFB3011)的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：对于现行的犯罪构成理论,学界存在着主张维持现状的"维持论"、主张修修补补的"改良论"和主张推倒重来的"重构论"。目前,维持论日益式微、重构论逐渐有力而改良论可谓似是而非。与从正面论证阶层式的犯罪论体系较之我国平面的体系所具有的优越性同样重要,就改良论者所提出的一些论断予以反驳,也是我们在正面主张重构犯罪构成理论时所面临的一个必需的理论课题。As to current theory of crime constitution, there are different claims which can come under three types： maintaining the current condition, making some improvements and reconstructing completely. Nowadays, the claims of maintaining are wasting while the claims of reconstructing are prospering, and the claims of reformation are so obscure. As important as demonstrating the superiority of the three - layered theory of crime constitution which owns compared with our leveled theory frontally , it is also a necessary theory subject when we frontally claim to reconstruct our theory of crime constitution, namely, to refuting some arguments expounded by reformers.

关 键 词：违法有责类型 实质的犯罪论 刑法学说 问题的思考 体系的思考 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]