基于过程和结果的评价:社会性别公平性评价体系  

Gender equity evaluation system:Based on the process and outcomes

作　　者：杨雪燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学公共管理与政策学院人口与发展研究所,西安710049

出　　处：《系统工程理论与实践》2008年第6期151-157,共7页Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice

基　　金：教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"(NCET-04-0931);西安交通大学"985工程"二期重点项目(07200701);美国福特基金(1035-1098)

摘　　要：目的:将社会性别视角纳入中国县区级计划生育/生殖健康优质服务的评价框架中,建立县区级计划生育/生殖健康优质服务的社会性别公平性评价体系,为在更广泛的领域当中进行公共卫生的社会性别公平性评价提供思路和方法.方法:采用文献查阅、访谈、专家评议等方法进行评价体系的设计;并通过在中国东部的安徽省巢湖市居巢区进行大规模调查、进行数据分析的方法验证该评价体系的可行性和有效性.结果:形成了包括过程和结果在内的中国县区级计划生育优质服务系统的社会性别公平性评价体系,并分别从过程和结果两个方面对安徽巢湖市居巢区的计划生育/生殖健康优质服务的社会性别公平进行了评价.结论:该评价体系是可行的,但是在稳定性和适用范围方面还需要进一步改进.Objectives： To integrate the gender perspectives into the evaluation system of Quality of Care （QOC） for Family Planning （FP）/Reproductive Health （R/I） at China＇s county level, and provide the gender equity evaluation in wider fields of Pubic Health with the frameworks and methods. Methods： Literature Review, Group Discussion, In- depth Interview, and Experts Rating methodologies were adopted for developing the evaluation system, and large-scale survey, data analysis were conducted for validating the flexibility and validity of the evaluation system. Results： The evaluation system including process and outcomes for Gender Equity in Quality of Care for Family Planning/ Reproductive Health at China＇s county level was founded, and applied into the Gender Equity Evaluation of QOC for FP/RH of Juchao county of Anhui from the angles of process and outcomes. Conclusions： The evaluation system is valid and feasible, but the stability and the scope for applibility need to be improved.

关 键 词：社会性别公平性 评价体系 中国县区级 计划生育优质服务 系统分析 

分 类 号：G92[文化科学]