检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴培新[1]
出 处:《上海金融》2008年第6期38-43,共6页Shanghai Finance
摘 要:货币政策一般认为,作为金融数量指标的货币供应量在货币政策调控中占据着核心地位,而排斥另一重要金融数量指标——信贷规模的作用。本研究试图利用我国自1998年以来的经济金融数据,通过计量方法,比较货币供应量、信贷规模作为核心金融指标的适用性,发现:(1)信贷规模和货币供应量各自在不同意义上都是最稳定的,并且,各自与经济活动之间的关系一样规则而稳定,没有证据表明何者更具优势;(2)在同时引入货币供应量和信贷规模时,大大提高了对实体经济的解释能力;(3)货币供应量的变化依存于信贷规模的变化,表明信贷规模在我国经济金融中占据一定地位。这些结论对于理解我国货币政策传导机制是有意义的,表明政策调控时,应同时关注货币供应量和信贷规模这两个指标。Credit Scale should be taken as a crucial financial quantity indicator, given its important role in monetary policy function. Based on China's economic and financial data since 1998, the paper adopts econometric methods to compare the feasibility of money stock and credit scale as financial indicator. The research reaches conclusions as following: (1) Money stock and credit scale are both stable indicators. They are both regularly related to economic activities. (2) Adopting both money stock and credit scale into the VAR model perfects the model in terms of explanation ability. (3) Money stock is determined by credit scale, meaning that credit scale is at least of great significance. These conclusions are enlightening for China's mon- etary policy operation.
关 键 词:VAR模型 GRANGER因果检验 货币政策 货币供应量 信贷规模
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.104.216