停滞还是突进:欧洲一体化停滞的另一种考察  

Stagnation or Onrush: A Distinctive Investigation of European Integration Stagnation

作　　者：韩秀义[1] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁师范大学法学院,辽宁大连116029

出　　处：《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2008年第3期27-31,共5页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部基地重大攻关项目"欧盟宪法与欧盟超国家治理研究"(05JJDGJW051)

摘　　要：在欧洲一体化史家的视野中,欧洲一体化在20世纪60～80年代中期陷入了停滞,但是以法律人格理论来考察,则会得出"在这个时期一体化或欧盟宪政不仅没有陷入停滞状态反而得到了重大发展"的结论。这种发展是以法律为中心内容的单线突进。正是这种突进,为欧盟宪政秩序奠定了坚实的宪法性基础。对于这种发展,可以从法律形式主义、政治与法律辩证的关系以及政策结构等方面来加以解释。For the historians of the European integration, the process of the European integration was entrapped in stagnation from 1960s to 1980s. However, the survey by the theory of legal personality shows that 'the European integration or European Constitutionalism in this phase did not fall into stagnation but experienced enormous development.' This development is a mongline onrush with law as central issue. Just because of the onrush, the solid constitutional foundation has been laid for the European Constitutionalism order. This development can be interpreted from the perspectives of legal formalism, the dialectical relationship between politics, and law and policy structure.

关 键 词：欧洲一体化 法律人格 停滞 突进 欧盟宪政 

分 类 号：D813.1[政治法律—国际关系]