检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:皮勇[1] 陈德杰[1] 陈志丹[1] 王卫星[2]
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学同济医学院附属襄樊医院普外科,441021 [2]武汉大学人民医院
出 处:《临床外科杂志》2008年第6期392-394,共3页Journal of Clinical Surgery
摘 要:目的对腹腔镜胆总管切开术与内镜联合腹腔镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效进行比较和评价。方法回顾性分析2002年7月至2007年7月,20例行腹腔镜胆囊切除、胆总管探查(LCD组),15例行腹腔镜胆囊切除联合内镜乳头括约肌切开取石术(EST+LC组)患者的手术及术后情况。结果LCD组近期并发症发生率低于EST+LC组(20%vs 5%,P<0.05),LCD组平均住院日和平均住院费用均明显低于EST+LC组(P<0.05),手术成功率两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆总管切开术是治疗胆囊结石并胆总管结石疗效肯定的微创手术。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of different laparoscopic treatments for cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods From July 2002 to July 2007, the data of 20 cases receiving laparoscopic choledochotomy (LCD group) and 15 cases of common duct stones receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy ( EST + LC group) were analyzed retrospectively. Results The complication morbidity in EST + LC group was higher significantly,the average hos- pital stay was longer and cost of hospitalization was less than in LCD group ( all P 〈 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in success rate of the operation ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The LCD for treating cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis is safe and feasible with a confirmative curative effect and minimal invasion.
关 键 词:腹腔镜 胆囊结石 胆总管结石 内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117