检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄皖生[1]
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2008年第6期23-24,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的探讨治疗腰椎间盘突出症的较佳疗法。方法将116例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为治疗组(腹针+推拿+牵引)和对照组(推拿+牵引),对治疗前后症状的改善情况进行对照观察。结果治疗组有效率为98.3%,对照组为82.8%,两组总有效率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论腹针、推拿、牵引并用治疗在改善腰椎间盘突出症临床症状方面优于推拿加牵引。Objective To seek a better method for treating lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. Methods One hundred and sixteen patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion were randomly allocated to a treatment group (abdominal acupuncture, traction and massotherapy) and a control group (traction and massotherapy). Improvements in the symptoms were compared after treatment. Results The efficacy rate was 98.3% in the treatment group and 82.8% in the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in total efficacy rate between the two groups (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Combined use of abdominal acupuncture, traction and massotherapy improves the clinical symptoms of lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion more than traction plus massotherapy.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.59