温针和激光穴位照射治疗颞颌关节功能紊乱的疗效比较  

Comparison of the Efficacy of Warm Needling with Laser Radiation in Treating Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

作　　者：张翠彦[1] 郭惠杰[2] 袁巍[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学人民医院针灸科,北京100044 [2]北京大学人民医院口腔科,北京100044

出　　处：《上海针灸杂志》2008年第6期29-30,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion

摘　　要：目的评价传统疗法(温针)和现代疗法(激光照射)治疗颞颌关节功能紊乱的疗效和优缺点。方法60例患者随机分为治疗组(温针)和对照组(激光照射),治疗组取下关穴和阿是穴给予温针,其他穴位常规疗法针刺,对照组给与以上穴位激光治疗。分别比较两组的疗效和治疗的次数和经济花费情况。结果治疗组和对照组疗效比较差异无统计学意义(治愈率分别为93.3%和90.0%),治疗组和对照组的平均治疗次数和花费比较差异有统计学意义(治疗组平均治疗15次、花费120元,对照组平均治疗8次、花费400元)。结论两种疗法各有利弊,可根据情况采用。Objective To assess the advantages and disadvantages of traditional treatment （warm needling） and modem treatment for temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Methods Sixty patients were randomly allocated to a treatment group （warm needling） and a control group （laser radiation）. In the treatment group, point Xiaguan （ST7） and ashi point were given warm needling and other points, conventional acupuncture. In the control group, the above points were given laser radiation. The therapeutic effects, the numbers of treatments and the costs were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference in therapeutic effect between the treatment and control groups （the cure rate was 93.3% and 90.0% respectively）. There were statistically significant differences in average number of treatments and cost between the treatment and control groups （on average, 15 treatments received and 120 yuan spent in the treatment group and 8 treatments received and 400 yuan spent in the control group）. Conclusion Two treatments have their own advantages and disadvantages and can be administered according to the condition.

关 键 词：颞下颌关节疾病 温针疗法 激光针刺 颞颌关节功能紊乱 

分 类 号：R246.83[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]