检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学第一临床医学院老年病科,太原030001 [2]忻州市人民医院呼吸科
出 处:《山西医科大学学报》2008年第6期558-561,共4页Journal of Shanxi Medical University
基 金:山西省自然科学基金项目资助(20011069)
摘 要:目的观察吸入激素(ICS)联合缓释茶碱(SRT)和ICS联合长效β2-受体激动剂(LABA)治疗哮喘的有效性及其比较。方法将30例中度持续哮喘患者随机分为布地奈德联合缓释茶碱组(S组)及布地奈德联合福莫特罗组(L组)。比较两组患者治疗前后临床改善及呼气峰流速变异率(PEF%)、第1秒用力呼气流速占预计值百分比(FEV1%)变化。结果两组达到良好控制的比例无统计学差异(P>0.05),治疗后两组PEF%较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05),FEV1%较治疗前显著增加(P<0.05),上述两指标改善率两组间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论与ICS联合LABA比较,ICS联合SRT治疗哮喘疗效相同且费用低廉。Objective To compare the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with slow-released theophyllines (SRT)and ICS combined with long acting β2-agonist (LABA)on asthma. Methods Thirty patients with moderate persistent asthma were randomly treated with budesonide+SRT (group S,n=15) or budesonide+formoterol(group L,n=15)for 6 weeks.The peak expiratory flow rate variation (PEFRv),forced expiratory volume in one second expressed as percentages of predicted normal values(FEV1%)were determined and compared before and after treatment in two groups. Results The proportion of well-controlled asthma patients had no significant difference between two groups(P〉0.05).After treatment,PEFRv decreased significantly and FEV1% increased significantly in two groups(P〈0.05),but there was no significant difference in improvement rate of PEFRv and FEV1% between two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion ICS+SRT and ICS+LABA therapy have the same effects on asthma,but the cost of ICS+SRT is lower than that of ICS +LABA.
关 键 词:哮喘 吸入激素 缓释茶碱 长效Β2-受体激动剂
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249