检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨居正[1]
出 处:《产业经济研究》2008年第4期37-43,共7页Industrial Economics Research
摘 要:借用一个局部垄断的概念,本文分析了核心技术拥有者的最优决策。相对于垄断整个产业链,局部垄断可以帮助核心技术拥有者在不降价的情况下扩大市场需求,以下游厂商的惨烈竞争为代价换来更高利润。此时,上游核心技术垄断者有动机引入越来越多的企业进入下游产业,营造一个完全竞争的成品市场,虽然这一措施降低了最终产品的售价,有利于消费者剩余的提高,但固定成本的存在会导致产业链下游的企业重复投资,产生巨大的社会损失。As the leader of computer hardware industry, why does Intel choose only to be monopoly of the CPU market instead of monopoly of the whole PC industry? Analogously, why does Philips only sell encoders instead of VCD/DVD players by itself? Using a partially monopoly framework, we analysis the optimum response of the core technology owners. We illustrate that being a partially monopoly supplier in an industrial chain can help the tech-owners expand their market share without decreasing their product prices, with the downstream fierce competition as the sacrifice. Upstream tech-owners usually have an incentive to hire an increasingly larger and larger population of downstream manufacturers, which in result create a competitive consuming market. Comparing with the traditional monopoly of the whole chain, partially monopoly deduces the ultimate price of consuming products and improves the social welfare when not taking fixed cost into account. However, once we take fixed cost into consideration, this kind of market structure means a huge sunk cost to society.
分 类 号:F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.197.104