“学衡派”与新文学者诗学理念异同论——以胡先骕与胡适为代表  

On Similarities and Differences of Xueheng School and New Litterateur in Poetic Philosophy——Taking Hu Xiansu and Hu Shi as Representatives

作　　者：钟军红[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东技术师范学院文学院,广东广州510665

出　　处：《华南师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2008年第3期46-51,共6页Journal of South China Normal University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学"十五"规划项目"胡适与中国新诗形态建构的得与失"(批准号:03/04HI/-02)

摘　　要：学者大多将"学衡派"放置在一个与新文学者尖锐对立的层面,笔者细读诗论原典却发现,"学衡派"与新文学者的诗学理念既对立冲突,又相反相成。冲突集中在变革是否须付诸实践尤其是诗的体式是否须变革,但有关中国诗歌面临困境亟需变革和承继中国诗学优良传统等方面,却心存默契甚至相反相成。文学革命乃至中国现代文学的比较健康的发展便与此有关。以胡先骕与胡适为代表,从两种诗学理念之冲突焦点、两种诗学理念之主要区别、两种诗学理念之内在默契三方面可见两者之间的异同,进而可探寻形成他们之间差异及默契的主要原因。Most scholars usually regard Xueheng School and New Litterateur as opposing each other.The author of this article,however,after a careful reading of the original poetic classics,finds out that the poetic philosophy of the two schools complement each other while opposing each other.The conflict of the two focuses on whether the reformation needs to be carried out in practice,especially on whether poetic style needs to be reformed,but concerning the fact that Chinese poety was confronting a difficult situation and badly in need of a reform and whether the fine tradition of Chinese poetry should be inherited,the two schools complement each other,which urged a comparatively healthy development of literary revolution,and even contemporary Chinese literature has benefitted from it.This article intends to analyze,by taking Hu Xiansu and Hu Shi as representatives,the similarities and differences in three aspects,conflict,differneces and inner recognition of the two poetic philosophy,and explore the reasons for them.

关 键 词：学衡派 新文学者 诗学理念 异同 

分 类 号：I229[文学—中国文学] I226