腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫全切术与经腹部子宫全切术的临床效果比较  

Clinical comparison of laparoscopically assited vaginal hysterectomy and transabdominal hysterectomy

作　　者：邓小华[1] 

机构地区：[1]邵阳市第一人民医院妇科,湖南邵阳422001

出　　处：《中国医药导报》2008年第18期40-41,共2页China Medical Herald

摘　　要：目的:比较腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫全切术(LAVH)与经腹部子宫全切术(TAH)的临床效果。方法:收集我院2004年6月～2006年6月接受以上两种途径子宫切除术的病例共150例的临床资料,其中,LAVH100例(LAVH组),TAH50例(TAH组),比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后病率及住院时间等。结果:LAVH组手术时间与TAH组比较,差异无显著性(P>0.05),但LAVH组术中出血量、术后病率及住院时间均明显小与TAH组,差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论:LAVH创伤小、病人痛苦少,术后恢复快。Objective：To compare the clinical characteristics of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy（LAVH） and transabdominal hysterectomy （TAH）.Methods： Clinical data about 150 cases who recived LAVH and TAH were collected. The operation time,intraoprative blood loss,postoprative pyrexia rates and hospital stay time were compared between LAVH group（n=100） and TAH group（n=50）. Results：The operation time was not significantly different between LAVH group and TAH group （P〉0.05）.The intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pyrexia rates and hospital stay time were lower in LAVH group than in TAH group （P〈0.01）.Conclusion： LAVH shows advantages of less invasion,less pain and quicker recovery.

关 键 词：腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫全切术 经腹部子宫全切 

分 类 号：R713[医药卫生—妇产科学]