检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]厦门大学附属中山医院ICU,福建厦门361004
出 处:《海南医学院学报》2008年第4期365-366,369,共3页Journal of Hainan Medical University
摘 要:目的:探讨经锁骨上途径行锁骨下静脉穿刺置管用于ICU的可行性。方法:选择ICU中需行深静脉穿刺置管的患者346例,经锁骨上途径组183例和经锁骨下途径组163例,在局麻下完成锁骨下静脉穿刺置管。结果:经锁骨上途径组比锁骨下途径穿刺组操作时间短(P<0.05),进针深度较浅(P<0.05),一次穿刺成功率较高(P<0.05),并发症较少(P<0.05),两组总穿刺成功率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:锁骨上途径用于ICU中的锁骨下静脉穿刺置管快速,安全,并发症少,值得推广。Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of subclavian vein puncture and catheterization via percutaneous supraclavicular approach in ICU. Methods: A total of 346 patients to be treated by deep venous puncture and catheterization were divided into two groups : patients in the first group (n = 183) treated via supra- clavicular approach and those in the second group (n = 163 ) via subclavian approach. The surgical management was performed under the condition of local anesthesia. Results: Compared with the supraclavicular approach group, shorter operative time, shorter puncture length, higher success rate of first puncture, but less complications were found in the supraclavieular approach group (P 〈0.05 in all), There was no significant difference in the total success rate between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion: Subclavian vein puncture and catheterization via percutaneous supraclavicular approach for ICU patients prove to be rapid and safe with fewer complications and may have wider application in clinical practice
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30