检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国民航大学经济与管理学院,天津300300
出 处:《交通运输工程学报》2008年第3期116-121,共6页Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
基 金:国家软科学研究计划项目(2006GXQ3B205)
摘 要:为准确评价航空公司竞争力,提出了多级模糊综合评价方法,分析了航空公司竞争力的含义与影响因素,建立了网络型航空公司竞争力评价指标体系,运用层次分析法确定各层次指标权重。确定指标隶属度时,定性指标采用模糊统计法,数量化指标分为正向指标、适中指标与负向指标分别予以确定。分析结果表明:评价指标体系科学合理,多级模糊综合评价方法能够很好地解决评价指标与评价等级判定的模糊性问题,评价结果能够客观地反映航空公司竞争力的总体水平,航空公司可以根据评价结果有针对性地进行竞争力的培育与建设工作。In order to evaluate airline's competitiveness exactly, a multilevel-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was proposed, the denotation of airline's competitiveness and its effect factors were analyzed, and a competitiveness evaluation index system of network airline was built, in which the weights of evaluation indices were determined by analytic hierarchy process(AHP). The membership grades of qualitative indices were determined with statistical method of fuzziness, positive index, neutral index and negative index were applied to define the membership grades of quantitative indices. Analysis result indicates that the system is reasonable, the method can resolve the fuzzinesses of evaluation indices and rating levels appropriately, the evaluation result can reflect the general level of airline's competitiveness objectively, and the airline can cultivate its competitiveness exactly according to the result. 3 tabs, 1 fig, 16 refs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117