多余指定原则的弊端剖析  

On the superfluity establishment principle

作　　者：白占立[1] 寇占奎[2] 张百松[2] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学学报编辑部,河北石家庄050016 [2]河北师范大学法政学院,河北石家庄050091

出　　处：《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第4期61-64,共4页Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：河北省科技厅软科学研究项目(项目编号:07457291);河北师范大学科学研究项目(项目编号:W2006Y19)

摘　　要：从一定意义上说,多余指定原则是在对法律的误解中产生的,存在很多弊端,如法院在适用该原则后,一些专利能否还成为专利值得考虑;侵犯了法的确定性原则,损害公众利益,阻碍技术创新和进步;与国际不接轨,给我国专利的世界性保护带来不便;与我国的法律体系相矛盾;不利于专利代理人和专利代理待业的发展。This paper carries out a theoretical analysis of the legal basis of the superfluity establishment principle. It is claimed that intellectual property right ensures the protection of the benefits of the owners in addition to the public interests. The establishment of right impingement is to take into consideration both the privacy properties of the patent and the equality of benefit shares. So it is estimated that the principle of the superfluitv establishment will eventually disappear from Chinese law,

关 键 词：专利 多余指定 弊端 司法保护 

分 类 号：D923.425[政治法律—民商法学] G306.3[政治法律—法学]