检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院
出 处:《西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版)》2008年第3期424-428,共5页Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:陕西省科技攻关项目(2000K13-G10)
摘 要:着重研究电凝聚技术和电气浮技术处理城镇生活污水的有效性和差异性.通过改变影响因素,进行试验研究,从而对电凝聚技术和电气浮技术处理城镇生活污水的效果进行对比.电凝聚和电气浮对COD去除效果较高,其出水COD值可达城镇二级污水处理二级标准;而电气浮对SS和色度的去除效果比电凝聚差.采用电凝聚技术处理小规模、分散性的城镇生活污水具有一定的推广价值.The availability and feasibility for municipal domestic sewage treatment by electrocoagulation and electroflotation were studied in this paper. Treatment results of municipal domestic sewage by electrocoagulation and electroflotation through changing factors were compared. Higher COD removal efficiency is achieved by electocoagulation and electroflascation. The effluent COD value could reach the secondary standard of towns' secondary sewage treatment. The SS and color removal by electroflotation were worse than by electrocoagu-lation. It had some promotional value that small-scale, decentralized nature of municipal domestic sewage were treatmented by electrocoagulation.
分 类 号:X506[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188