检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学法学院,天津300071
出 处:《天津市政法管理干部学院学报》2008年第2期68-73,共6页Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law
摘 要:科索沃问题的实质是国际法上的分离问题,国际法上不存在分离权,民族自决权也不包含分离权,因此科索沃不能主张行使分离权,更无权要求取得第三国的支持和援助,除例外情况,国际法禁止对他国进行干涉。对一国分离运动进行的干涉,侵犯了该国国家主权和领土完整,违反了国际法基本原则和《联合国宪章,》国际社会、联合国和国际法从未允许第三国或国际组织干涉一国分离运动。The essence of the issue of Kosovo is secession in international law.There is no right to secession in international law which is not included in the right to self-determination.So Kosovo can not exercise the right to secession and it has no right to obtain a third-country's support and assistance.Apart from exceptional cases,intervening other countries is prohibited in international law.To intervene in a country's secession movement violates its sovereignty and territorial integrity and violates the basic principles of international law and the UN Charter.It is never permitted that a third country or international organization can intervene in a country's secession movement in the international community、 the United Nations and international law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222