检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘晓斌[1] 侯本祥[1] 卫书盛[1] 宿颖[2]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓科 [2]首都医科大学口腔医学研究所,北京100050
出 处:《现代口腔医学杂志》2008年第4期356-358,共3页Journal of Modern Stomatology
基 金:北京市科技新星计划项目(H013610290113);首都医学发展科研基金(2005-3046)
摘 要:目的评价GuttaFlow常温流动牙胶根管充填系统的根尖封闭性能。方法实验牙沿釉牙骨质界截冠,逐步后退法根管预备,2.5%次氯酸钠冲洗,分别以GuttaFlow常温流动牙胶和SystemB联合ObturaⅡ热牙胶充填系统充填根管。采用改良葡萄糖定量检测微渗漏模型测定第1、2、4、7、10、15、20、30d从冠方向根方渗漏的葡萄糖量。结果GuttaFlow常温流动牙胶和SystemB联合ObturaⅡ热牙胶充填系统的根尖封闭性能均较好,第7d起,GuttaFlow常温流动牙胶的封闭能力显著优于SystemB联合ObturaⅡ热牙胶充填系统(P<0.05)。结论GuttaFlow常温流动牙胶根管充填系统观察期内具有较好的根尖封闭能力。Objective To evaluate the sealing ability of GuttaFlow root canal filling material. Methods Root canals were instrumented using the step - back technique and filled with GuttaFlow and System B combined with Obtura Ⅱ according to the instructions. Leakage was measured with a newly designed leakage test device for the leaked glucose in apical reservoir at 1, 2, 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 30 days. Results Both of the two materials had good apical sealing ability, but GuttaFlow was surperior to the warmfilling system. There were statistically significant differences between the 2 test groups since the 7^th day. Conclusion GuttaFlow had a better apical sealing ability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.41.47