两种不同治疗方案对缩短寻常性银屑病疗程的比较  

Compare atiou of Two Different Treatment Scenarios for Vulgaris Psoriasis

作　　者：戴尔红[1] 袁肖海[1] 章伟[1] 王学民[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海市皮肤病性病医院,上海200050

出　　处：《中国皮肤性病学杂志》2008年第6期353-354,共2页The Chinese Journal of Dermatovenereology

摘　　要：目的比较两种不同治疗方案对治疗寻常型银屑病疗程的影响。方法选用两组不同的治疗方案,应用PASI评分法对寻常性银屑病患者的疗效进行观察。结果两组患者治疗前PASI评分差异无显著性(P>0.05),而治疗后传统治疗组PASI评分低于阿维A组(P<0.05)。传统治疗组平均治疗周期短于阿维A组(P<0.05)。结论应用PASI能够比较客观的掌握银屑病患者的病情,传统治疗方案仍不失为治疗寻常性银屑病的一种良策。Object To compare two different treatment scenarios effect on the course of vulgaris psoriasis. Methods： We used two different treatments for psoriasis patients. PASI score was used to observe the effect, Result The PASI scores had no significant differenct before treatment （ P 〈 0. 05 ）. After treatment , the different between the two groups was significant （ P 〉 0. 05 ）. Whatever traditional treatment group or acitretin treatment group, after treatment the PAST were significanty improved than before （ P 〈 0. 05 ）, Conclusion The alteratian of the disease can be easy understood by the using of PASI score. The traditional treatment is a good method to treat vulgaris psoriasis,

关 键 词：寻常性 银屑病 PASI评分 

分 类 号：R758.63[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]