检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王青林[1]
机构地区:[1]人民出版社,北京100706
出 处:《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第4期39-43,共5页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:当今学界,对古代中国是否存在宪法,仁智互见。人们或是从概念界定出发,论证古代中国并不存在宪法;或是从功能分析出发,论证古代中国也同样存在宪法。概念界定和功能分析的论证方法都有其正确性,然而同样存在不足。正确的看法是既承认古代宪法与近现代宪法有实质区别又承认两者有必然联系。在当代宪政建设中,必须实现对中国古代宪法的扬弃过程,此有利于宪政理论研究现状之突破和宪政制度之完善。In today's academic circles, scholars have different views on whether there were constitutions in ancient China. It is proved from the point of conceptual definition that there were no constitutions in ancient China. And it is likewise proved from the point of functional analysis that there existed constitutions in ancient China. The demonstrative method of conceptual definition and that of functional analysis are both correct and deficient. The right attitude we should take is to recognize the essential differences and inevitable connections between ancient constitutions and modern or contemporary ones. In the construction of con- temporary constitutionalism, we must develop the useful and discard the useless of the ancient Chinese constitutions, which will contribute to a breakthrough of the status quo of constitutional theory research and to the perfection of constitutional systems.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143