检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱春艳[1]
出 处:《自然辩证法研究》2008年第7期33-37,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基 金:2007年辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学项目"技术批判与现代性的重建"(编号:20060670)
摘 要:运用社会学方法,分析美国技术哲学家安德鲁·费恩伯格的"技术民主化"理论,提出这一理论存在三个主要缺陷:一是对技术理性的改造过于夸大了技术的社会属性,忽视了技术发育的自主性,对技术的社会因素的分析表现出空泛化;二是对参与者利益的分析过于抽象,未看到利益问题的复杂性与国家控制性;三是技术代议制理论存在相冲突之处,表现出外行的大众和技术专家在使技术民主化的动机上表现出不对称性,一个是关注各自的利益,另一个则是对社会和大众的责任伦理。提出这一理论总体上缺乏应有的理论高度,从而起不到预期的社会作用。Analyzing American philosopher of technology Andrew Fernberg's "democratization theory of technology" through the sociological method, proposing that this theory has three main flaws: First, it has exaggerated technology's social attribute, then neglected the independence of technical growth, simultaneously, its analysis of the social factors of technique is general Second, the analysis of the participants' interest is too abstract, it has not seen the complexity and the national controlling towards interest; Third, the technical representative system theory is contradiction, which appears the dissymmetry of the motive of layman's and experts technical democratization, one pays attention to the respective benefit, and the other pays attention to social and mass's responsibility ethics. The proposing of this theory does not reach a theoretical level which it should have, thus failed to play the anticipated social function.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222