检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2008年第7期91-98,共8页Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:未决羁押在不同的社会形态中反映出不同的性质,在不同的诉讼阶段也有不同的意义,基本上已经成为一种制度化的刑事诉讼强制措施。分析西方各国未决羁押制度的现状可以总结出各国未决羁押的特点。从这种比较中可以更好地理解我国未决羁押的现状和特点,也可以看到我国学术界对未决羁押性质的模糊认识所带来的问题。如欲解决这些问题,我国需要确定未决羁押的法定化,建立未决羁押的司法审查机制,未决羁押的司法救济机制,使未决羁押成为一个较封闭的司法控制系统。Pretrial detention reflects the different nature in different society, and also has different meaning in different stage of litigation. It has already become an institutionalized coercive measure of criminal procedure basically. Through analyzing the current situation of pretrial detention in western countries, we can summarize its nature in different countries. And we can comprehend the nature and the current situation of pretrial detention in china much better from this comparison. In the same time, we can conclude the problems which are brought from the vague cognition of academe to the nature of pretrial detention in our country. For solving these problems, China needs to confirm the legalization of pretrial detention, establish the judicial review mechanism and judicial relief mechanism of pretrial detention, making pretrial detention become a more closed judicial control system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.254