检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王敏[1] 谢林碧[1] 王迎光[1] 刘建涛[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市高明区人民医院,广东佛山528500
出 处:《河北医学》2008年第8期898-899,共2页Hebei Medicine
摘 要:目的:芬太尼静脉自控镇痛与传统镇痛应用于重度烧伤休克期,比较两组消化道出血的发生率。方法:将重度烧伤患者50例随机分成实验组和对照组,每组25例,实验组予芬太尼静脉镇痛,对照组予哌替啶50mg异丙嗪25mg肌肉注射,观察镇痛开现后患者的VAS评分、消化道出血发生率。结果:实验组VSA评分低于对照组。(P<0.05)两组消化道出血的发生率实验组低于对照组。(P<0.05)。结论:芬太尼静脉自控镇痛能给重度烧伤患者满意镇痛,能减少该期患者消化道出血的发生率。Objective: To study the application of fentanyl - vein controlled analgesic for severe degree burn patients,who were occupying inhibitory stage of shock ,and to the incidence rate of alimentary tract hemorrhage in two groups patients. Methods: To elect 50 severe burn patients,who were divided into two groups randomly ,one was experiment group(EG) ,the other was control group(CG) , every group had 25 patients, to supply the fentanyl vein controlled analgesic for EG;to supply meperidine 50mg, phenergan 25mg for CG by intramuscular injection, when the analgesic start, to observe the VAS score and the incidence rate of alimentary tract hemorrhage. Results: EG' s VSA score was lower than the CG's ( P 〈 0.05 ) , EG' s incidence rate of alimentary tract hemorrhage was lower than the CG' s ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion:For severe burn patients, compare with tradition analgesic, fentanyl-vein controlled analgesic could supply satisfactory analgesic, and could diminish the the incidence rate of alimentary tract hemorrhage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.254.237