关于缩减刑法分则“法定犯”罪名的思考  

Reflection on the"Legal Crime"Narrowed or Removed from Specific Provisions of Criminal Law

作　　者：蔡青荣[1] 苏雅民 

机构地区：[1]河北司法警官职业学院,河北石家庄050081 [2]河北公安警察职业学院,河北石家庄050091

出　　处：《河北学刊》2008年第4期160-162,共3页Hebei Academic Journal

摘　　要：刑法分则过多规定"法定犯"不符合现代刑法"省刑"、"谦抑"思想,法治社会不是条文越多越好。刑法有自身的调整范围,不是所有的行政违法行为发展到严重程度就都构成犯罪。现行刑法中许多"法定犯"的社会危害性和行为人的主观恶性达不到犯罪程度,甚至不属于犯罪的性质。法定犯使空白罪状过多实际上把部分刑事立法权变相地交由行政机关行使,与立法法的精神相悖。基于以上考虑,建议大幅缩减刑法分则"法定犯"罪名。＂ Legal crime＂ in Specific Provisions of Criminal Law is not fit for the thought of reducing punishment in modern criminal law. The criminal law has its own boundary, and not all against administrative law will be criminals to their extremes. In the extant criminal law many of＂ legal crime＂ cannot lead to harming the society, which does not belong to crime. In doing so, the criminal law will be exercised by administrative authorities, which is against the spirit of law. It is suggested that＂legal crime＂should be narrowed and removed from Specific Provisions of Criminal Law in a large scale.

关 键 词：刑法分则 法定犯 主观恶性 社会危害性 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]