检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院,浙江杭州310016
出 处:《浙江预防医学》2008年第8期1-2,5,共3页Zhejiang Journal of Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨用HOMA2方法评价中国2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗和胰岛β细胞功能的可行性。方法对448例2型糖尿病患者同步采用HOMA和HOMA2方法计算胰岛素抵抗指数(IR)、胰岛β细胞功能指数(%B),并收集其他临床指标,对两公式的相关性和差异进行比较。结果经自然对数转化的HOMA2-IR和HOMA2-%B分别与HOMA-IR、HOMA-%B明显相关,且HOMA2-IR和空腹胰岛素值、空腹血糖值有更强的相关性。结论HOMA2方法适用于中国2型糖尿病的临床应用,并且在评价胰岛素抵抗方面可能优于HOMA方法。Objective To explore the feasibility of HOMA2 used for evaluation of insulin resistance and isletβ-cell function in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods Both of HOMA and HOMA 2 were used to calculate the insulin resistance index (IR) and islet β-cell function index (%β) in 448 patlentswith type 2 diabetes mellitus. The correlation and difference between HOMA and HOMA 2 were compared. Results The logarithmic transformed HOMA 2-IR and HOMA 2-% βsignificantly correlated with HOMA-IR and HOMA-% β, respectively. HOMA 2-IR correlated more strongly with fasting plasmainanlin (FINS), fasting plasma glucose (FlaG). Conclusion HOMA 2 is applicable to the clinical practice in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and may be superior to the HOMA in evaluation of insulin resistance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3