检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪关宝 关丽征[2] 王海萍 徐春凤 曲利园[2] 梁万年[2]
机构地区:[1]北京市中关村医院,100080 [2]首都医科大学卫生管理与教育学院
出 处:《中国全科医学》2008年第14期1229-1231,共3页Chinese General Practice
基 金:首都医学发展科研基金资助项目(首都CJ1999)
摘 要:目的了解社区老年骨质疏松高危人群生命质量基本情况,探讨采取健康教育等干预措施对该人群生命质量的影响。方法采用美国简明健康测量量表(SF-36量表)修订中文版对北京中关村社区(干预组)和学院路社区(对照组)老年骨质疏松高危人群进行干预前调查,然后对干预组实施健康教育。干预后再次对两组进行SF-36量表调查,评价生命质量改变情况。结果干预前两组人群生命质量的8个维度中仅有BP和RE得分间差别有统计学意义(P<0.01);干预后两组人群生命质量的PF、BP、VT、SF、RE、MH得分间差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后干预组生命质量的PF、RP、BP、GH、SF、MH得分与干预前比较,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05);干预后对照组生命质量的PF和RP得分与干预前比较,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采取健康教育等干预措施可以使老年骨质疏松高危人群在生理、心理、社会功能方面的生命质量得到改善。Objective To contribute the knowledge of life quality of elderly population highly risky of osteoporosis, and to find out proper interventions, such as health education, to affect their quality of life. Methods Survey was performed on elderly osteoporosis high- risk population in Zhong- guan -cun Community (intervention group) and College Road Community of Beijing (control group) by USA MOS SF - 36 before intervention, and then the intervention group were given health education and the changes of their quality of life were evaluated. Results The quality of life of intervention group was improved after intervention, the scores of six dimensions, physiological function (PF), vitality (VT), social function (SF), emotional function (RE), Mental Health (MH) and body pain (BP) were significantly improved, as compared with control group. Conclusion Use of such intervention measures as health education can improve life quality of elderly osteoporosis high - risk population in physiology, psychology and social function. On the contrary, their quality of life won't be improved or even gradually decline if intervention is not given.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200