农民工收入的家庭分割消费效应——基于对城市化影响的视角  

The Family Segmentation Consuming Effect of the Peasant Worker's Income ——Based on the visual angle of the effect of urbanization

作　　者：魏剑锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学工商管理研究所,河南开封475004

出　　处：《郑州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2008年第4期68-72,共5页Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：农民工市场已成为城市劳动力市场的重要组成部分,因户籍制度约束,农民工往往是个体单独流动而非举家迁移,这与西方发达国家城乡劳动力转移市场有很大差别。农民工单独流动导致工资收入在城乡两地分割消费,从而引发一系列深层次经济问题:(1)农民工收入流出城市用于农村家庭消费导致城市总收入水平降低,减少了当地的投资;(2)城乡居民在消费结构上存在巨大的差异,用于农村家庭消费部分,会产生不同于城市居民的消费效应,因而,农民工工资流出不利于消费结构升级和产业结构的高度化;(3)农民工单独流动的转移机制对城市二、三产业的协调发展带来不利影响。The peasant worker markets have become the important component in urban labor markets. Because of the limitation of the registration system, the peasant workers often flow individually but not with their whole families. This is much different from the condition of theWestern developed countries, where the peasant workers flow with their families. Owing to the individual flow, the peasant worker＇s wage income has to consume in urban region and rural region respectively, which gives rise to a series of deep economic questions. They are： The peasant worker＇s income is partly consumed in rural regions, which leads to the decease of the total income level of the urban regions, thus the investment of the corresponding city decreases. There exists large gaps between the rural and the urban consumes, which will lead to different consuming effects. So, the flow out of the peasant workers income doesnt benefit the rise of consuming structure and the elevation of industrial structure. The individuallyflowing mechanism of the peasant worker brings unfavorable influence on the coordinated development of the second and the third industries of the cities.

关 键 词：农民工市场 单独流动 消费分割 城市化效应 

分 类 号：F241.2[经济管理—劳动经济]