检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄婷[1]
出 处:《中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2008年第4期29-32,共4页Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology(Social Sciences)
摘 要:就中国传统法律文化诉讼观念而言,"厌恶诉讼"的观点曲解了人们对于诉讼的真实态度。回避诉讼并不意味着厌恶诉讼。在纠纷解决机制多元化的当代社会中,起诉或是弃诉都只是个人对诉讼活动进行利益权衡之后做出的正当的理性选择。在这个意义上来说,所谓的"厌诉"情结,其实只是一个法学虚构。As the litigant concept of traditional legal culture in China, the opinion of "disgust to litigation" misinterprets the accurate attitude to the litigation. Dodging the litigation doesn't mean the disgust to litigation. In modern society, the ways of the settlement of conflict are various, both prosecution and abnegating the litigation are allowable and rational choice that people weigh the benefit of litigation. In this sense, the feelings of "disgust to litigation" are just virtual image in the science of law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.239.15