结构分析的范围与限度  

Domains and Limitations of Structural Analysis

作　　者：刘丰[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300071

出　　处：《世界经济与政治》2008年第7期57-61,共5页World Economics and Politics

摘　　要：最近20年间,国际关系理论的论争主要围绕着对结构分析视角的批判、辩护和扩展而展开。任何社会科学研究都是在特定的"域"中展开的,必须限定其解释对象和适用范围。在对特定的国际关系理论进行评估时,我们也需要考虑理论的范围及其限度。在考察结构现实主义与新古典现实主义之间的关系时,我们也要注意到由于二者的适用范围不同,结构分析与单元分析在现实主义传统内部并不是矛盾的,而是互补的。In the past two decades,the debates of IR theories were centered on the criticism,defense and development of the structural analysis.The author argues that the all social science studies are unfolded in specific domains,with limited subjects for explanation and scopes for application.When evaluating a specific theory in the international relations,we should take its domain and limitation into consideration.Given the relationship between structural realism and neo-classical realism,the structural and unit analysis,with differences in their applying scopes,are complementary rather than contradictory based on the realist tradition.

关 键 词：单元 结构现实主义 新古典现实主义 

分 类 号：D80[政治法律—政治学]